Abstract

The goal of this study was to compare MR-based PET patient attenuation correction (AC) to CT-based AC in the head using clinical whole-body FDG-PET patient data obtained from a tri-modality PET/CT & MR setup. The MR-based AC utilizes an atlas-based approach, registering the patient's MR images to a CT-based atlas, producing `pseudoCT' images. Thirteen clinical whole-body FDG patients were included in this study. PET mean activity concentration values were measured and compared in six ~ 15 ml volumes-of-interest throughout the brain tissue. The AC methods compared to CT-based AC were segmentation of the CT (air, fat, soft tissue) and atlas-based MR-AC. Results: PET activity concentration was systematically under-estimated on average by 1.32 kBq/ml (4.9%) when using the segmented CT-based AC, mainly due to lack of attenuation correction for skull bone. Using the atlas-based method, the error was reduced to 0.03 kBq/ml (0.2%) on average. PET image visualization demonstrated spatial variations in activity concentration accuracy induced by the AC methods that were consistent with the approximations in each method. Conclusion: The results demonstrate that the atlas-based AC in the head provides adequate PET quantitation and image quality as compared to methods that do not account for bone.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.