Abstract

Tracking technologies offer a way to monitor movement of many individuals over long time periods with minimal disturbances and could become a helpful tool for a variety of uses in animal agriculture, including health monitoring or selection of breeding traits that benefit welfare within intensive cage-free poultry farming. Herein, we present an active, low-frequency tracking system that distinguishes between five predefined zones within a commercial aviary. We aimed to evaluate both the processed and unprocessed datasets against a “ground truth” based on video observations. The two data processing methods aimed to filter false registrations, one with a simple deterministic approach and one with a tree-based classifier. We found the unprocessed data accurately determined birds’ presence/absence in each zone with an accuracy of 99% but overestimated the number of transitions taken by birds per zone, explaining only 23% of the actual variation. However, the two processed datasets were found to be suitable to monitor the number of transitions per individual, accounting for 91% and 99% of the actual variation, respectively. To further evaluate the tracking system, we estimated the error rate of registrations (by applying the classifier) in relation to three factors, which suggested a higher number of false registrations towards specific areas, periods with reduced humidity, and periods with reduced temperature. We concluded that the presented tracking system is well suited for commercial aviaries to measure individuals’ transitions and individuals’ presence/absence in predefined zones. Nonetheless, under these settings, data processing remains a necessary step in obtaining reliable data. For future work, we recommend the use of automatic calibration to improve the system’s performance and to envision finer movements.

Highlights

  • Introduction published maps and institutional affilTracking technologies generate sequences of chronologically ordered location data and offer a way to monitor movement of many individuals over long time periods with minimal disturbances

  • We further reported a gain in performance using a tree-based classifier to filter false registrations, accounting for

  • The active LF tracking system evaluated in this study determined the presence/absence of birds in a zone with an accuracy of 99% but overestimated the number of transitions by birds per zone, explaining only 23% of the true variation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tracking technologies generate sequences of chronologically ordered location data and offer a way to monitor movement of many individuals over long time periods with minimal disturbances. Cage-free housings are uniquely complex and may introduce numerous challenges for tracking technologies. Cage-free housings of laying hens often contain a relatively high concentration of material that can interfere with tracking signals, including metal hardware (e.g., perches, floor, feeding lines) and multiple stacked horizontal levels that prevent direct lines of sight require by some automated tracking technologies (e.g., video tracking, infrared). Compared to most other livestock, laying hens are relatively small iations

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.