Abstract
Land Surface Temperature (LST) is an important input parameter for many land surface models. The accuracy of satellite LST products directly affect its application; therefore, it is necessary to evaluate LST products. In this study, two satellite remotely sensed LST products, i.e. AMSR2 LST and MODIS LST, were evaluated against the in-situ LSTs at 17 ground sites in Heihe River Basin in 2014. Results show that both AMSR2 and MODIS LSTs have good correlations with the in-situ LST, with R2 from 0.80 to 0.98 except at AR2 site at daytime. However, both of these two products have large systematic errors compared with the in-situ LST. The possible main reason is the scale mismatch between the FOV of the longwave radiometer and the AMSR2 and MODIS pixels.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.