Abstract

ObjectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of mechanical debridement and/or air polishing on the healing of ligature-induced buccal periimplantitis dehiscence defects in dogs.Material and methodsForty-eight implants were placed in the mandibles of twelve beagle dogs, and periimplantitis was induced for 2 months using ligatures. The resulting buccal dehiscence-type defects were surgically cleaned and augmented (xenogenic filler and resorbable membrane) according to one of the following treatments: (1) Cleaning with carbon curette (debridement - D) and guided bone regeneration (GBR/G): DG, (2) air polishing cleaning (A) and GBR: AG, (3) a combination of D/A/G: DAG, and (4) D/A without GBR: DA. After 2 months, histomorphometric and inflammatory evaluations were conducted.ResultsThe median bone gain after therapy ranged between 1.2 mm (DG) and 2.7 mm (AG). Relative bone gain was between 39% (DG) and 59% (AG). The lowest inflammation scores were obtained in DA without GBR (5.84), whereas significantly higher values between 8.2 and 9.4 were found in the groups with augmentation. At lingual sites without defects, scores ranged from 4.1 to 5.9. According to ISO, differences above 2.9 were considered representative for irritative properties.ConclusionsAll treatments resulted in partial regeneration of the defects. No treatment group showed a significantly (p < 0.05) better outcome. However, pretreatment with air polishing showed a tendency for less inflammation. Noteworthy, inflammation assessment showed an overall irritative potential after GBR in the evaluated early healing phase.Clinical relevancePeriimplantitis treatment still represents a big issue in daily practice and requires additional preclinical research in order to improve treatment concepts.

Highlights

  • The use of implants in dental practice has become a routine procedure in order to replace one or more missing teeth using either fixed or removable dentures

  • Periimplant inflammations diagnosed as mucositis and periimplantitis should be mentioned in the first place [3]

  • Most implants were lost during periimplantitis induction, i.e., before periimplantitis treatment was started

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The use of implants in dental practice has become a routine procedure in order to replace one or more missing teeth using either fixed or removable dentures. High success rates of up to 97% after 10 [1] and 75% over 20 years [2] underline the excellent applicability of this treatment. Prosthetic and biological complications may cast a cloud over this enthusiastic impression. Periimplant inflammations diagnosed as mucositis and periimplantitis should be mentioned in the first place [3]. They are specified as plaqueassociated pathological conditions affecting the soft and hard tissues around dental implants, resulting in inflammation of the mucosa and progressive periimplant bone loss [4].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call