Evaluation of adding the CANTAB computerized neuropsychological assessment battery to a traditional battery in a tertiary care center for veterans

Abstract

Numerous advantages of and concerns about computerized neuropsychological assessment systems have been noted. Here we report a program evaluation of incorporating a computerized system, the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB), in our tertiary assessment center for Veterans. Patients were 23 consecutive referrals to the Western War Related Illness and Injury Study Center, an interdisciplinary assessment center within the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System for Veterans with complex medical presentations. Patients were administered both the CANTAB and a brief traditional neuropsychological battery. The correlation between global composite scores from each method was .71 (p < .05), indicating “good” concordance. Concordance was “fair” to “good” for scores on specific cognitive domains. However, concordance was lower when classifying patients’ cognition as “impaired” or “not-impaired” based on a cutoff score. Despite the CANTAB’s primarily visuospatial interface, discrepancy between the two methods’ scores was not associated with patients’ visuospatial abilities. The two methods were similarly sensitive to deficits associated with posttraumatic stress disorder, which is prevalent among the Center’s patients. The CANTAB was judged to be a valid and useful complement to, but not an acceptable alternative to a traditional neuropsychologist-administered cognitive assessment battery for the Center’s specific patients and needs.