Evaluation of a Uniaxial Powder Tester and Comparison with an Annular Shear Tester

Abstract

Bulk flowability measurement of particulate systems for quality control and product development purposes requires a fast, repeatable, accurate and affordable characterization approach. In the present study, two versions of the recently developed Freeman Technology Uniaxial Powder Tester (UPT) are compared to the Schulze Ring Shear Tester and the Johanson Hang-Up Indicizer. The UPT instruments were found to have excellent repeatability in measurements of uniaxial unconfined yield stress and compressed bulk density across a broad range of materials. Amongst the testing devices investigated in this study, the computer-controlled Advanced UPT (AUPT) instrument showed higher repeatability than the Manual UPT (MUPT) and the Johanson Indicizer. The Schulze Ring Shear Tester (RST) had slightly better repeatability than the AUPT, but there were a few situations in which its automated software did not produce a value of unconfined yield stress, resulting in a need to manually process the data. For most of the test cases, the AUPT measured a higher value of uniaxial unconfined yield stress than the MUPT. This was attributed to the stress relaxation that the powder bed experiences in the MUPT, where the consolidation stress is not automatically maintained on the sample. The AUPT measured lower values of unconfined yield stress compared to the Schulze RST for all the cases in this study. This is a well-recognized occurrence as the Schulze RST and other biaxial testers, in contrast to the AUPT, brings the sample to the critical consolidation state before measuring the shear strength. The AUPT produced its flow function data in about half the time as the Schulze RST.