Evaluation of a small-diameter sampling method in magnetic susceptibility, AMS and X-ray CT studies and its applications to mafic microgranular enclaves (MMEs) in granite

Abstract

This paper reviews the technical details of the small diameter sampling method in a study of anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) and X-ray CT (computed tomography) and their applications to studies of MMEs (Mafic Microgranular Enclaves) in granite. The AMS results based on 9mm diameter cylinder specimens collected from the Cretaceous Tongkengxi mafic dykes in South China were consistent with results using 25mm diameter specimens. The first case study demonstrated the variation of AMS in the interior of a large MME from South China, which contained a center of strong short-range magnetic lineation. This type of magnetic fabric could be detected only by using sample cores with a small diameter. In the foliation direction, the host granite interacted with the MME more heavily and produced a region with a high magnetite content. The second case study was the investigation of the MMEs in the Early Cretaceous Muchen complex in eastern South China. The MME swarms exhibited relatively uniform magnetic fabrics at the outcrop scale, but the fabrics varied significantly at the intrusion scale. AMS of the MME swarms is coaxial with that of the host granite only at some localities. The disagreement of AMS between MME and host granite either imply different magma flow directions, or different magma flow velocities, or disturbance of the granite fabric by the MME. The MMEs in a mylonitic granite from eastern North China were also studied. The MME specimens show highly variable magnetic susceptibility and lineations. They can be only studied appropriately by a small drill. In the three cases, the three magnetic susceptibility axes of the MMEs are consistent with the volume-weighted maximum eigenvector of long/intermediate/short axes of magnetite. The orientations of the magnetite long axes in the three cases form several modes and the concentration of the modes results in a strong lineation. One implication of this study is that MMEs, with the same magmatic fabrics as their host granite, most likely represent mafic magmas flowing with granitic magmas. Another implication is that the interaction between MMEs and host granite, which is strengthened by magmatic flows or ductile deformations, may promote crystallization of magnetite and formation of magnetite-rich granitoids. The presented 9mm sampling methods provides easy ways to study the petrofabrics and other properties of small-sized features such as MMEs and their detailed internal textures.