Abstract
BackgroundNeurological disorders are common in sub-Saharan African, but accurate neuroepidemiologic data are lacking from the region. We assessed a neuroepidemiological screening tool in a rural Ugandan cohort with high HIV prevalence. MethodsParticipants were recruited from the Rakai Neurology Study in rural Rakai District, Uganda. A nurse administered the tool and a sociodemographic survey. 100 participants returned for validation examinations by a neurologist (validation cohort). The diagnostic utility and validity of the instrument were calculated and characteristics of those with and without neurological disorders compared. ResultsThe tool was administered to 392 participants, 48% female, 33% people with HIV, average age 35.1 ± 8.5 years. 33% of the study cohort screened positive for neurologic disorders. These participants were older [mean (SD): 38.3 (9.7) vs. 33.5 (7.1) years, p < 0.001], had a lower Karnofsky score [89.8 (8.4) vs. 93.9 (7.5), p < 0.001] and had a lower body mass index [21.8 (3.3) vs. 22.8 (3.7), p = 0.007] than those who screened negative. Amongst the validation cohort, 54% had a neurological abnormality of which 46% were symptomatic. The tool was 57% sensitive and 74% specific for detecting any neurological abnormality and 80% sensitive and 69% specific for symptomatic abnormalities. ConclusionsWe found a lower sensitivity and similar specificity for the screening tool compared with two previous studies. The lower validity in this study was likely due in part to the high percentage of asymptomatic neurological abnormalities detected. This screening tool will require further refinement and cultural contextualization before it can be widely implemented across new populations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.