Abstract

In settings such as needle-stick injuries or intravenous drug abuse, immediate knowledge of the anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) serostatus instead of waiting for the results of a laboratory-based test can be important to guide further medical procedures and appropriate hygienic advises. Thus, a rapid on-site anti-HCV test was evaluated in daily clinical routine and compared with a laboratory-based certified assay. Ten microliters of serum or EDTA whole blood was analyzed using a chromatographic immunoassay (Toyo anti-HCV test). Results were available on-site 5-15 min after sample centrifugation. The Architect anti-HCV test served as a reference method. Sera of 189 patients were analyzed (without HCV infection: n=105; HCV infection: n=84). The assay was evaluable in 185 cases (98%). The sensitivity and specificity were 99 and 88%, respectively. With EDTA whole blood, the test was evaluable in 47/52 samples (90%). Forty-six of 47 evaluable EDTA tests were concordant with serum results. The one HCV patient with an unevaluable serum test was diagnosed correctly with the EDTA sample. The rapid chromatographic anti-HCV immunoassay has limited specificity, which impairs clinical practicability. A positive result warrants re-evaluation with a certified serologic assay.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call