Abstract

Patients diagnosed with early gastric cancer located in the middle third of the stomach have two major surgical options, namely a conventional distal gastrectomy with Billroth I anastomosis (DG) or a pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG). Pyloruspreserving gastrectomy is thought to have greater functional benefits than DG, but the evaluation of its prognosis and outcome has so far been insufficient. Between 1997 and 2007, 133 patients were diagnosed with early gastric cancer located in the middle third of the stomach. Distal gastrectomy was performed in 87 and PPG was performed in 46 of these patients. The clinicopathological characteristics were compared between the groups. There were fewer dissected lymph nodes in PPG (mean: 21.9) than in DG (mean: 30.4, P = 0.001). Complications were detected in 16.1% of DG patients and in 6.5% of PPG patients. The occurrence of stasis after PPG (6.5%) was similar to that observed after DG (6.9%). One patient in the DG group died from cancer recurrence, but cancer recurrence was not detected in the PPG group. Although the difference was not significant, the overall 5-year survival rate in the 46 PPG patients (95%) was better than that in the 87 DG patients (86%, P = 0.087). Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy patients had fewer postoperative complications than DG patients. The long-term follow-up of these patients will clarify the nutritional and prognostic benefits of PPG.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call