Evaluation of a postgraduate training programme for community mental health practitioners

Abstract

Government guidelines on mental health care in England have considerable implications for the level of competency required by the mental health workforce. Implementing these changes requires the widespread introduction of training initiatives whose effectiveness in improving staff performance need to be demonstrated through programme evaluation. This exploratory study evaluates the impact of a 2-year mental health training programme by measuring skill acquisition and skill application, by identifying the key ingredients for facilitating the transfer of learning into practice, and by examining differences in outcome between the academic and the non-academic students. High skill acquisition and application was reported in the majority of interventions, however, low skill application was reported for some key interventions (assertive outreach, dual diagnosis). Statistically significant differences were found between student cohorts in one intervention for skill acquisition (crisis intervention) and two interventions for skill application (client strengths model; medication management). The main ingredients for facilitating transfer were found to be the credibility of the trainers and training alongside colleagues from their own workplace. Some of the possible explanatory factors for these findings are discussed.