Abstract
Fit of N95/P2 half-face respirators is critical.No objective ways exist to evaluate their implementation at use. Previously, we showed 26% of health care workers achieve appropriate fit at point of use. 657 quantitative fits were conducted on 166 subjects, using 4 different respirator styles. Randomization was performed; controls employing standard"fit-check"and intervention using a infrared video kiosk. Primary outcome was passing rates of quantitative fit, with secondary outcomes of respirator type, gender, race, and previous experience. Intervention demonstrated significantly higher pass rate (50.6%) compared with controls (30.8%). Odds of passing with kiosk was 2.3 (odds ratios [OR] 2.3, 95%confidence intervals [CI] 1.8-2.9,P<.001). Duckbill style improved the greatest (OR 4.1, 95%CI 2.1-7.9,P<.001), and Tri-fold also showing substantial benefit (OR 2.66, 95%CI 1.4-5.2,P<.001). Gender and race did not influence outcomes when using the kiosk, nor did previous experience. A custom point-of-use kiosk improved odds of achieving a satisfactory fit of common respirator styles, independent of participant demographics. These findings open the door to addressing a gap in respiratory protection programs by providing individual assessment and interventions that improve worker safety at the time of highest risk.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.