Abstract

BackgroundThe duration of an opioid prescribed at hospital discharge does not intrinsically account for opioid needs during a hospitalization. This discrepancy may lead to patients receiving much larger supplies of opioids on discharge than they truly require.ObjectiveAssess a novel discharge opioid supply metric that adjusts for opioid use during hospitalization, compared to the conventional discharge prescription signature.Design, setting, & participantsRetrospective study using electronic health record data from June 2012 to November 2018 of adults who received opioids while hospitalized and after discharge from a single academic medical center.Measures & analysisWe ascertained inpatient opioids received and milligrams of opioids supplied after discharge, then determined days of opioids supplied after discharge by the conventional prescription signature opioid-days (“conventional days”) and novel hospital-adjusted opioid-days (“adjusted days”) metrics. We calculated descriptive statistics, within-subject difference between measurements, and fold difference between measures. We used multiple linear regression to determine patient-level predictors associated with high difference in days prescribed between measures.ResultsThe adjusted days metric demonstrates a 2.4 day median increase in prescription duration as compared to the conventional days metric (9.4 vs. 7.0 days; P<0.001). 95% of all adjusted days measurements fall within a 0.19 to 6.90-fold difference as compared to conventional days measurements, with a maximum absolute difference of 640 days. Receiving a liquid opioid prescription accounted for an increased prescription duration of 135.6% by the adjusted days metric (95% CI 39.1–299.0%; P = 0.001). Of patients who were not on opioids prior to admission and required opioids during hospitalization but not in the last 24 hours, 325 (8.6%) were discharged with an opioid prescription.ConclusionsThe adjusted days metric, based on inpatient opioid use, demonstrates that patients are often prescribed a supply lasting longer than the prescription signature suggests, though with marked variability for some patients that suggests potential under-prescribing as well. Adjusted days is more patient-centered, reflecting the reality of how patients will take their prescription rather than providers’ intended prescription duration.

Highlights

  • We ascertained inpatient opioids received and milligrams of opioids supplied after discharge, determined days of opioids supplied after discharge by the conventional prescription signature opioid-days (“conventional days”) and novel hospital-adjusted opioiddays (“adjusted days”) metrics

  • The adjusted days metric demonstrates a 2.4 day median increase in prescription duration as compared to the conventional days metric (9.4 vs. 7.0 days; P

  • Prolonged opioid prescriptions and higher daily doses of opioids have been associated with significantly increased risk of development of chronic opioid therapy, opioid use disorder, and opioid overdose [1,2,3]

Read more

Summary

Background

Citation: Iverson NR, Lau CY, Abe-Jones Y, Fang MC, Kangelaris KN, Prasad P, et al (2020) Evaluation of a novel metric for personalized opioid prescribing after hospitalization. PLoS ONE 15(12): e0244735. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0244735 The duration of an opioid prescribed at hospital discharge does not intrinsically account for opioid needs during a hospitalization. This discrepancy may lead to patients receiving much larger supplies of opioids on discharge than they truly require.

Objective
Results
Conclusions
Introduction
Study design & patient selection
Discussion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.