Evaluation of a multi-staged bias correction approach on CHIRP and CHIRPS rainfall product: a case study of the Lake Hawassa watershed

Abstract

Abstract A promising future development area to improve the accuracy of satellite rainfall estimates (SREs) is accessing merits from different sources of data through combining algorithms. The main objective of this study is to assess the accuracy and importance of the fused multistage approach of bias correction. Accordingly, two versions of resampled and spatially bias-corrected Climate Hazards Group Infrared Precipitation (CHIRP) estimates were merged with ground measurements using a conditional merging procedure. Results of applied performance measures (i.e. seven) on corrected and merged CHIRP SREs show that the Percent of Detection (POD) and Percent Volume Error (PVE) have improved. Depending on the combination of coupled stations for validation, up to 70 and 50% PVE improvement was achieved at some stations for wet and dry periods, respectively. Moreover, the bias-corrected and conditionally merged CHIRP SREs have outperformed the estimates by resampling CHIRP with station dataset (CHIRPS) over the sparsely populated western part of the watershed. However, the devised method was limited in considering dry-day events during bias correction, which in turn has affected the performance of the bias correction of the CHIRPS product. Finally, future research should concentrate on such methods of fusing to understand the benefits of various approaches and produce more precise rainfall records.