Abstract

PurposeSeveral studies have evaluated the utility of extrapolating the Calvert formula in calculating carboplatin (CBDCA) dosages in solid tumours; however, data regarding haematological cancers are less. Therefore, we conducted a preliminary study of the utility of extrapolating the Calvert formula in calculating CBDCA dosages for DeVIC ± R therapy.MethodsA retrospective study on 57 non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients who had received DeVIC ± R therapy was conducted. The area under the curve (AUC) of CBDCA was back-calculated from actual dosages using the Calvert formula. Patients were divided into two groups according to an AUC ≥ 4 or an AUC < 4, respectively. The Revised Response Criteria of the International Working Group and CTCAE version 4.0 were used for assessing the treatment efficacy and adverse events, respectively.ResultsThe use of AUC instead of body surface area had greater utility in calculating CBDCA dosage, with a response rate of greater than 50 % in patients receiving DeVIC ± R therapy with an AUC ≥ 4 for CBDCA. The response rate of the AUC ≥ 4 group was significantly higher than that of the AUC < 4 group. Decreased platelet and neutrophil counts of grade ≥3 occurred at higher rates in the AUC ≥ 4 group.ConclusionThe extrapolation of the Calvert formula has utility in calculating the CBDCA dosage for DeVIC ± R therapy, and therapeutic efficacy was increased by maintaining the AUC of CBDCA at ≥4.

Highlights

  • Carboplatin (CBDCA), a type of platinum-containing drug, is widely used in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer, cervical cancer and malignant lymphoma [1]

  • In Japan, medical package inserts for CBDCA recommend a dose calculation method according to the body surface area

  • We performed the present preliminary study to evaluate whether the Calvert formula can be extrapolated for CBDCA dose calculation in DeVIC ± R therapy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Carboplatin (CBDCA), a type of platinum-containing drug, is widely used in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer, cervical cancer and malignant lymphoma [1]. Has demonstrated utility in calculating CBDCA dosage as it takes into account individual differences in renal function [3]. The utility of this method has been documented in studies of Japanese patients [4]. A combination therapy of CBDCA and paclitaxel (TC therapy) is used to treat ovarian cancer, and a combination therapy of CBDCA and Cancer Chemother Pharmacol (2016) 78:305–312 pemetrexed is used to treat non-small cell lung cancer In both cases, the Calvert formula is used to calculate CBDCA doses, with a target AUC of 5.0–7.5 [5] for TC therapy and 6 for CBDCA + PEM therapy [6] shown to be adequate

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call