Abstract

Motion sickness (MS) is a syndrome associated with symptoms like nausea, dizziness, and other forms of physical discomfort. Automated vehicles (AVs) are potent at inducing MS because users are not adapted to this novel form of transportation, are provided with less information about the own vehicle’s trajectory, and are likely to engage in non-driving related tasks. Because individuals with an especially high MS susceptibility could be limited in their use of AVs, the demand for MS mitigation strategies is high. Passenger anticipation has been shown to have a modulating effect on symptoms, thus mitigating MS. To find an effective mitigation strategy, the prototype of a human–machine interface (HMI) that presents anticipatory ambient light cues for the AV’s next turn to the passenger was evaluated. In a realistic driving study with participants (N = 16) in an AV on a test track, an MS mitigation effect was evaluated based on the MS increase during the trial. An MS mitigation effect was found within a highly susceptible subsample through the presentation of anticipatory ambient light cues. The HMI prototype was proven to be effective regarding highly susceptible users. Future iterations could alleviate MS in field settings and improve the acceptance of AVs.

Highlights

  • Accepted: 15 April 2021With the introduction of the SAE Level 4 (L4) of automated driving [1], the role shift for the human from driver to passenger is inevitable

  • Since items of the Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) test for symptoms that are not exclusive to Motion sickness (MS), participants might have arrived at the experiment with symptoms present

  • If they recovered from the symptoms during the experiment, this could have resulted in a measured decrease of MS, confounding the effect of MS

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Accepted: 15 April 2021With the introduction of the SAE Level 4 (L4) of automated driving [1], the role shift for the human from driver to passenger is inevitable. An L4 automated vehicle (AV) is defined to be capable of performing dynamic driving tasks without any expectation on the user to intervene. One of the anticipated changes in passenger behavior is the frequent engagement in non-driving related tasks (NDRTs). These tasks include sleeping, relaxation, reading, consuming display-based media, and engaging in social interaction [2]. The vehicle’s interior configuration is expected to adapt with design concepts considering flexible seating arrangements to enhance the passenger experience. This mode of transportation could increase quality of life for users that commute daily, travel long distances, or have busy schedules. In a survey by Schoettle and Sivak, for example, about half of the participants reported that they had experienced MS during a car ride [13]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call