Abstract

This paper presents a camera-based prototype sensor for detecting fatigue and drowsiness in drivers, which are common causes of road accidents. The evaluation of the detector operation involved eight professional truck drivers, who drove the truck simulator twice—i.e., when they were rested and drowsy. The Fatigue Symptoms Scales (FSS) questionnaire was used to assess subjectively perceived levels of fatigue, whereas the percentage of eye closure time (PERCLOS), eye closure duration (ECD), and frequency of eye closure (FEC) were selected as eye closure-associated fatigue indicators, determined from the images of drivers’ faces captured by the sensor. Three alternative models for subjective fatigue were used to analyse the relationship between the raw score of the FSS questionnaire, and the eye closure-associated indicators were estimated. The results revealed that, in relation to the subjective assessment of fatigue, PERCLOS is a significant predictor of the changes observed in individual subjects during the performance of tasks, while ECD reflects the individual differences in subjective fatigue occurred both between drivers and in individual drivers between the ‘rested’ and ‘drowsy’ experimental conditions well. No relationship between the FEC index and the FSS state scale was found.

Highlights

  • Driver fatigue and drowsiness are common causes of road accidents

  • We begin the presentation of the results by showing how percentage of eye closure time (PERCLOS), eye closure duration (ECD), and frequency of eye closure (FEC)

  • Driver fatigue detection is realised by analysing values of the PRECLOS, ECD, and FEC indicators

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Driver fatigue and drowsiness are common causes of road accidents. Among over36,000 people killed in motor vehicle traffic crashes on US roadways during 2019, 1.9% of fatalities involved a drowsy driver [1]. Police reports from European countries showed that 1% to 3% of all traffic accidents were caused by fatigue or drowsiness while driving [2]. Many research groups have proposed different technical solutions to detect driver fatigue early and minimise the risk of road hazards. These solutions can be grouped into three categories according to the fatigue detection methods, which are based on monitoring (1) vehicle driving parameters, (2) driver physiological parameters, or (3) driver facial features [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. The sensors for measuring driving parameters are mounted on a vehicle and relatively cheap; the data they provide may be affected by road or weather conditions, and these sensors should be used together with devices of other categories [3,15,16]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call