Abstract

The molecular detection of Candida plays an important role in the diagnosis of candidaemia, a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The sensitivity of this diagnosis is partly related to the efficiency of yeast DNA extraction. In this monocentric study, we investigated the suitability of 11 recent automated procedures for the extraction of low and high amounts of Candida DNA from spiked blood. The efficacy of the DNA extraction procedures to detect Candida spp. in blood samples ranged from 31.4% to 80.6%. The NucliSENSTM easyMAGTM procedure was the most efficient, for each species and each inoculum. It significantly outperformed the other procedures at the lower Candida inocula mimicking the clinical setting. This study highlighted a heterogeneity in DNA extraction efficacy between the five main Candida species (Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis, Candida tropicalis and Candida krusei). Up to five automated procedures were appropriate for C. krusei DNA extraction, whereas only one method yielded an appropriate detection of low amount of C. tropicalis. In the era of the syndromic approach to bloodstream infection diagnosis, this evaluation of 11 automated DNA extraction methods for the PCR diagnosis of candidaemia, puts the choice of an appropriate method in routine diagnosis within the reach of laboratories.

Highlights

  • Candida species are among the top five pathogens associated with health-care bloodstream infections [1], carrying a high attributable mortality of up to 40% [2,3,4]

  • The results of efficiency, slope and Y intercept for each species-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are as follows: Candida albicans (135%; −2.315; 29.51), Candida glabrata (102%; −3.230; 37.44), Candida krusei (98.7%; −3.386; 39.08), Candida parapsilosis (126%; −2.484; 30.84) and Candida tropicalis (111.7%; −2.864; 34.64)

  • cycle threshold (Ct) values of albumin-PCR do not differ according to Candida species or the inocula tested

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Candida species are among the top five pathogens associated with health-care bloodstream infections [1], carrying a high attributable mortality of up to 40% [2,3,4]. PCR in blood samples has shown >90% specificity, and up to 100% sensitivity. These diagnostic indices are better than those of conventional blood culture, making PCR suited to the routine diagnosis of candidaemia [11,12,13]. DNA extraction needs to: (i) be highly efficient for DNA recovery from yeast, which are characterized by a highly complex and solid cell wall [15]; (ii) detect yeasts in low abundance, with a limit of one colony forming unit per milliliter (CFU/mL) [7]; and (iii) remove potential PCR inhibitors

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call