Abstract
Past research on evaluation criteria used in competitive debate has produced results contrary to common practice. This investigation employed multiple regression and correlational analysis to determine (1) whether the traditional six criteria of analysis, reasoning, evidence, organization, refutation, and delivery predict actual win-loss records, (2) the relative importance of each, and (3) the degree of independence of the judgments made.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Paper version not known
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
