Abstract
Leadership management has various benefits and advantages in the energy sector, such as improving energy sector development and obtaining sustainability benefits. However, the leadership management faces multiple challenges in the energy sector that must be evaluated and ranked. So, this study used the fusion multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodology to assess and rank the challenges of leadership management in the energy sector. The WASPAS method is a fusion MCDM method used to rank the alternatives. Five experts are invited to evaluate the criteria and alternatives. Fourteen criteria and 13 alternatives were collected in this study. The results show that alternative 4 is the best and alternative 8 is the worst. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to show the stability of the alternatives' ranks. The sensitivity analysis was conducted in two parts. In the first part, the lambda value of WASPAS changed between 0 and 1. In the second part, 14 cases are introduced in criteria weights. The results show that the rank of alternatives is stable in different cases.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
