Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the Machine Performance Check (MPC) 1.1 application for TrueBeam 2.5 and to establish MPC application as a comprehensive daily QA tool after verification. Methodology: An automated daily Quality check application MPC using IsoCal Phantom provided by Varian Medical System (VMS) to perform the essential tests such as beam consistency that is dosimetric performance and mechanical check were performed on TrueBeam. The data was collected over a period of four months (84 days). MPC acquired data consists of a series of generation of images using MV and kV at various gantry, collimator, and couch positions. The collected data is analyzed for daily reproducibility as well as comparison with ion chamber measurements. Findings: The results showed that the reproducibility of MPC was less than the tolerance values for the respective mechanical parameters. The MPC measured isocenter with mean value of 0.35 mm is within tolerance. The Beam Consistency showed that over a period of four months, the mean value of output measurement of 6 MV photon beam as measured by the MPC and Farmer Type Chamber FC65-G differ by less than 1%. It is evident that the MPC proved to be fast and easy to use QA tool for daily checking of machine performance. But it is evident from present study that, inter comparison with a Farmer Type chamber is needed, if the MPC has to replace the other QA tools. Keywords: MPC, QA, Linear Accelerator, EPID AS1000

Highlights

  • During the past two decades, there is continuous improvement in the treatment technology to treat Cancer Patients

  • Is used with Machine Performance Check (MPC) Internal Software Version 1.1.16.0 supplied by Varian Medical Systems, Inc

  • Output of the TrueBeam 2.5 was measured regularly and the results revealed that it was within tolerance as per TRS398 (8) protocol

Read more

Summary

Introduction

During the past two decades, there is continuous improvement in the treatment technology to treat Cancer Patients. The Treatment technology includes Treatment Planning Systems (TPS) and delivery of treatment through Linear Accelerator (Linac) equipped with state-of-the-art hardware and software technologies. Robust Quality Assurance (QA) is needed to check the equipment for any error as well as to comply with countries regulatory requirements (1,2). There are various types of QA tools available in the market (3) Which may be supplied. Nigam et al / Indian Journal of Science and Technology 2020;13(14):1470–1475 by vendor along with treatment machine or may be purchased separately. The main requirement for any QA equipment & procedure is that it should take minimum time to set, minimum time to perform and provide the complete result within minimum possible time. The result should be available online and offline for review

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call