Abstract
The correct evaluation of philosophy essays is an important topic in the didactics of philosophy. Two central questions are which evaluation criteria should be used and how they should be applied to reach fair grades. Focusing in this article on the essay competition of the International Philosophy Olympiad (IPO), the list of five evaluation criteria for an argumentative essay at the IPO is discussed. It is argued that these criteria should be specified, their status should be clarified, and a grading method should be developed. The article contains an appendix with a very short guide for evaluators at the International Philosophy Olympiad.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
