Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the fathead minnow larval survival and growth test (larval test) and the fathead minnow embryo-larval survival and teratogenicity test (embryo-larval test). These tests were developed for use by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regional and state programs and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permittees to estimate the chronic toxicity of effluents and receiving waters. Five larval tests with the reference toxicant, sodium pentachlorophenate, gave a mean subchronic value of 253 μg 1 −1 with a relative standard deviation of 39%. The mean LC 50, LC 10 and LC 1 values and their relative standard deviation for the embryo-larval test were 313 ± 6.4%, 224 ± 18% and 172 ± 27% μg 1 −1, respectively. The mean subchronic value for six larval tests with the reference toxicant, sodium dodecylsulfate was 6.0 mg 1 −1 with a relative standard deviation of 23%. The mean LC 50, LC 10 and LC 1 values for the embryo-larval test were 5.8 ± 2.6% 4.2 ± 5.9% and 3.3 ± 9.4% mg −1, respectively. Both types of test methods had a high-low ratio of no observable effect concentration values of 2, the reciprocal of the dilution factor. The mean subchronic value for four larval tests with linear alkylbenzene sulfonate was 2.1 mg 1 −1 and the subchronic values ranged from 1.7 to 3.4 mg 1 −1. Side-by-side tests were conducted with three effluents and hexavalent chromium. The larval test was more sensitive to two of the effluents and hexavalent chromium. The low test concentration of the third effluent caused an adverse effect in both tests.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.