Evaluation and Comparison of Aesthetic Results and Patient Satisfaction with Bilateral Breast Reduction Using the Inferior Pedicle and McKissock’s Vertical Bipedicle Dermal Flap Techniques

Abstract

In the last two decades, McKissock's technique for reduction mammaplasty was largely replaced by Robbins's inferior pedicle technique. However, a substantial number of plastic surgeons still perform McKissock's technique in the belief that it is superior to the inferior pedicle technique in terms of aesthetic results and complication rate. In this study, the authors compared the aesthetic results, complication rates, and patient satisfaction with the two techniques. Numerous studies in the past few years have shown an improvement in physical symptoms in addition to excellent patient satisfaction after breast reduction. However, almost all of these studies have used questionnaires that were mailed to the patients for evaluation. In the present study, aesthetic evaluations by the surgeon and an objective observer were performed in addition to evaluations by the patients themselves, thereby increasing the objectivity and the significance of the patients' evaluations. Two groups of 24 and 27 patients were compared. The groups were almost identical in terms of demographic data and the amount of breast tissue removed. The aesthetic results were good to excellent in both groups, and the groups had similar complication rates. When the patients' evaluations were compared with those of the surgeon and the objective observer, no significant difference was found between the observer and the patients. In one of the groups, the surgeon's evaluations were significantly higher than those of the patients, although they were not significantly higher than the observer's. In terms of aesthetic results, complication rates, and patient satisfaction, no differences existed between the groups. In addition, the patients' evaluations were determined to be a reliable index of aesthetic results and, in these cases, they were often identical to objective evaluations.