Abstract

UK energy policies position urban heat networks as components of a resilient low carbon, aff ordable system, but, as Stewart Russell’s work showed, such technologies have never been integrated into UK provision. This paper takes Russell’s legacy forward by examining prospects for urban district heating and combined heat and power development in the context of the fi nancial, rather than technological, innovations shaped by liberalised energy and fi nancial markets. Drawing on sociology of markets and social studies of fi nance, the paper examines the resulting evaluation practices. Findings indicate that such district energy infrastructure does not conform to the investment calculus, making a business case hard to establish. Bridging the value gap between liberalised fi nance and district energy requires actors willing to devise improvised solutions. In spite of the established sustainability credentials of the technology therefore, signifi cant deployment in the UK (and similar countries) will depend on political leadership and new fi scal policy.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call