Abstract

BackgroundSelecting the appropriate insulin pen needle is important to reduce pain and injection-related adverse events like insulin leakage. It also helps to improve medication adherence and glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the 6-mm and 8-mm 32.5-gauge insulin pen needles in terms of glycemic control, pain score, user preference, medication adherence, and injection adverse events in patients with T1DM.MethodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study of 62 patients with T1DM. All patients constituted an experimental group initially and then changed the length of the needle to be part of a self-control group. The glycemic control, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS) score, needle attribute score, and injection-related adverse events were measured for all patients with both lengths of needles. Patients were assessed at the baseline visit and followed up for three months. Statistical comparisons were done by the chi-squared test, paired t-test, and paired Wilcoxon test when appropriate with a two-tailed alpha level below 0.05 indicating statistical significance.ResultsWith the NanoPass® 32.5-gauge, 6-mm needle (Terumo Corp., Tokyo, Japan), patients had significantly lower glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) compared to 8-mm needles (7.9% vs. 8.3%; p<0.001). The proportions of patients who reported no hypoglycemic episodes were 22/62 and 9/62, with the 6-mm and 8-mm needles, respectively. The 6-mm needles were better in terms of the following parameters compared to 8-mm needles: mean needle attribute scores (36.7 vs. 24.2; p<0.001), median VAS pain scores (20 vs. 55; p<0.001), insulin leakage (6/62 vs. 20/62; p=0.002), and the MMAS score (4.9 vs. 3.4; p<0.001).ConclusionThis study provided an overview of the safety, adherence, pain score, and glycemic control relating to the 6-mm and 8-mm insulin needle lengths. Insulin injections using the NanoPass 32.5-gauge, 6-mm needle were associated with lower pain score, higher patient adherence, fewer adverse events, and better glycemic control compared to the 8-mm needle. Therefore, we recommend the use of the NanoPass 6-mm needle for patients with T1DM. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Highlights

  • According to the International Diabetes Federation report of 2019, diabetes mellitus (DM) affected about 463 million adult individuals worldwide [1]

  • The 6-mm needles were better in terms of the following parameters compared to 8-mm needles: mean needle attribute scores (36.7 vs. 24.2; p

  • This study provided an overview of the safety, adherence, pain score, and glycemic control relating to the 6mm and 8-mm insulin needle lengths

Read more

Summary

Introduction

According to the International Diabetes Federation report of 2019, diabetes mellitus (DM) affected about 463 million adult individuals worldwide [1]. About 10% of DM patients suffer from type 1 DM (T1DM), which results from the autoimmune destruction of beta cells of islets of Langerhans [2]. These patients usually present with the disease early in their life, and they require lifelong treatment with intensive insulin therapy to compensate for the shortage in endogenous insulin secretion. How to cite this article Al Hayek A A, Al Dawish M (June 17, 2020) Evaluating the User Preference and Level of Insulin Self-Administration Adherence in Young Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: Experience With Two Insulin Pen Needle Lengths. It helps to improve medication adherence and glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call