Evaluating the use of algal pigments to assess the biological condition of streams

Abstract

Assessments of stream condition using benthic algal communities have traditionally relied on taxonomy-based approaches to compare community structure at sites exposed to a stressor versus reference sites. Taxonomy-based methods are often effective, but they require high levels of training and are relatively time consuming and expensive. We examined the utility of assessing stream biological condition using algal pigments. We used gradient and control-impact study designs in 2008 and 2009 to compare the extent that algal pigments versus taxonomic descriptors of algal community structure varied along a 10.5-km stretch of the Flat River (South Nahanni River watershed, NWT, Canada) encompassing a gradient of nutrients and metals at sites upstream, adjacent to and downstream of a northern metals mine. We also calculated costs to quantify algal pigments relative to taxonomy-based methods. Multivariate analyses (ANOSIM tests, redundancy analysis) identified that pigment concentrations from benthic algal samples differed significantly (p < 0.05) between non-exposed and exposed river sites and were related to variations in water physico-chemical conditions. By contrast, community composition determined from taxonomy-based enumeration to the Order and Family levels did not differ significantly between non-exposed and exposed sites, and relations with water physico-chemical conditions were weaker and inconsistent between the study years. In-house costs to quantify algal pigments were lower than commercial rates to describe community structure using taxonomy. Thus, our data suggests that analysis of benthic algal pigments represents a viable and cost-effective bio-monitoring method for assessing anthropogenic effects on stream condition that merits further evaluation.