Abstract

When the nominal interest rate reaches the zero lower bound (ZLB), a conventional monetary policy, namely, the adjustment of short-term interest rate, may become impractical and ineffective for central banks. Therefore, quantitative easing (QE) is one of the few available policy options of central banks for stimulating the economy and dealing with deflationary pressure. Since February 1999, the Bank of Japan (BoJ) has conducted several unconventional monetary policy programs. Considering the scarce research in this field from a structural macroeconomic model approach, a medium-scale New Keynesian DSGE model with government bonds of different maturities was developed to check the portfolio rebalancing channel of quantitative qualitative easing (QQE) conducted by the BoJ from April 2013 on the basis of the assumption of imperfect asset substitutability. The model was calibrated on the basis of the structure of the Japanese economy in April 2013. The main conclusion is that the BoJ’s asset purchase has a real effect on pushing output and inflation higher, and long-term interest rates lower. Sensitivity simulation analysis shows that, given the same size of asset purchase, the persistence of asset purchase determines the peak effect in the short run. A long-lasting asset purchase can push up inflation higher, and long-term interest rates lower for a relatively longer period, but the long-run effect on output and investment does not have much difference. The policy implication for BoJ is just to announce a long-lasting QE program and make it credible to the market.

Highlights

  • Accepted: 4 June 2021For almost 15 years, from February 1999, when the Bank of Japan (BoJ) announced the commitment to the zero interest rate policy (ZIRP), to April 2013, when it started quantitative qualitative easing (QQE), it implemented unconventional monetary policy.During the recent global financial crisis, many advanced economies had to depart from conventional ways of conducting monetary policy, as they faced the zero lower bound (ZLB) and systemic risk

  • The importance of an unconventional monetary policy has been realized by macroeconomists and central banks both theoretically and practically

  • We consider a scenario in which the central bank increases its long-term bond holdings 100% and takes 6 years to gradually return to its normal level

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Unconventional Monetary Policy in The United Kingdom. Unconventional Monetary Policies and The Credit Market. Unconventional Monetary Policy in Practice: A Comparison of “Quantitative Easing” in Japan and The USA. International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance 11: 140–62. Unconventional Monetary Policy in US: Empirical Evidence from Estimated Shadow Rate DSGE Model. Unconventional Monetary Policy in Japan: Empirical Evidence from Estimated Shadow Rate DSGE Model. Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy 10: 1950007. Measuring The Macroeconomic Impact of Monetary Policy at The Zero Lower Bound. Forecasting Long-Term Interest Rates with a General-Equilibrium Model of the Euro Area: What Role for Liquidity Services of Bonds? Asia-Pacific Financial Markets 20: 383–430. [CrossRef]

Household
Fiscal and Monetary Authorities
Analysis of Portfolio Rebalancing Mechanism
Calibration
Results
Baseline Simulation
QE Sensitivity Analysis
Concluding Remarks
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.