Abstract

Cognitive control impairments in schizophrenia (SZ) can be evaluated using antisaccade tasks and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Studies, however, often compare people with SZ to high performing healthy people, making it unclear if antisaccade-related disruptions are specific to the disease or due to generalized deficits in cognitive control. We included two healthy comparison groups in addition to people with SZ: healthy people with high cognitive control (HCC), who represent a more typical comparison group, and healthy people with low cognitive control (LCC), who perform similarly on antisaccade measures as people with SZ. Using two healthy comparison groups may help determine which antisaccade-related deficits are specific to SZ (distinguish SZ from LCC and HCC groups) and which are due to poor cognitive control (distinguish the LCC and SZ groups from the HCC group). People with SZ and healthy people with HCC or LCC performed an antisaccade task during fMRI acquisition. LCC and SZ groups showed under-activation of saccade circuitry. SZ-specific disruptions were observed in the left superior temporal gyrus and insula during error trials (suppression of activation in the SZ group compared to the LCC and HCC group). Differences related to antisaccade errors may distinguish people with SZ from healthy people with LCC.

Highlights

  • Cognitive control involves filtering out distracting information in order to perform goal-directed responses, utilizing aspects of attention, inhibition, and working memory

  • By including two healthy comparison groups, we aim to isolate antisaccade disruptions that are specific to SZ from those that are due to general deficits in cognitive control and are not associated with the psychiatric diagnosis

  • The proportion of scorable trials did not differ across groups (HCC: M = 0.85, SD = 0.13; low cognitive control (LCC): M = 0.82, SD = 0.12; SZ: M = 0.85, SD = 0.10; F(2,68) = 0.41, p = 0.66)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cognitive control involves filtering out distracting information in order to perform goal-directed responses, utilizing aspects of attention, inhibition, and working memory. When a cue appears in a peripheral location in the horizontal plane, they are instructed to direct their glance to the mirror image location (opposite direction, same distance from center) [1]; glances toward the cue are errors and considered failures of cognitive control. Antisaccade tasks measure cognitive control because successful performance relies on the several key operations: attention to a visual cue, inhibition of the pre-potent response to look toward the cue when it Cognitive Control Deficits in SZ appears, and the generation of a voluntary response (the glance in the opposite direction), all while engaging working memory for task rules [2, 3]. Results of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies show that antisaccade performance is supported by regions distributed throughout the brain [supplementary and frontal eye fields (FEFs), posterior parietal cortex, and subcortical regions] [4,5,6,7,8,9], frontal regions like the dlPFC are important given that lesions result in elevated antisaccade error rates [10,11,12,13]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.