Abstract
Current recommendations for the elimination of canine-mediated human rabies focus on mass dog vaccination as the most feasible and cost-effective strategy. However, attempts to control rabies are often combined with canine surgical sterilisation programmes. The added value of sterilisation is widely debated. A systematic review was undertaken to compare the outcomes and impact of vaccination and sterilisation programmes with vaccination only programmes. A systematic search of three electronic databases (CAB s, Medline and Global Health) and grey literature was performed. From 8696 abstracts found, 5554 unique studies were identified, and 16 studies met the inclusion criteria. Eight described vaccination only programmes and eight described vaccination and sterilisation programmes. Indicators of impact measured were dog bites and/or doses of post-exposure prophylaxis administered; numbers of dog and/or human rabies cases; dog population demographic changes; changes in health and welfare of dogs, and indicators related to human behaviour change. The studies were contextually very diverse, programmes being implemented were complex, and there was variation in measurement and reporting of key indicators. Therefore, it was difficult to compare the two types of intervention, and impossible to make an evaluation of the role of sterilisation, using this evidence. Given the large number of vaccination and sterilisation programmes conducted globally, the lack of studies available for review highlights a gap in data collection or reporting, essential for impact assessment. There are several knowledge gaps concerning the impact of the sterilisation component alone, as well as subsequent effects on rabies transmission and control. Prospective studies comparing the outcomes and impact of the two interventions would be required in order to establish any additional contribution of sterilisation, as well as the underlying mechanisms driving any changes. In the absence of such evidence, the priority for rabies control objectives should be implementation of mass vaccination, as currently recommended by the World Health Organisation.
Highlights
Many high-income countries have eliminated canine-mediated rabies, usually through a combination of vaccination and stray dog control
We identify gaps in knowledge regarding the implementation and impact of the sterilisation component as well as any resulting effects on rabies transmission and control
These findings are similar to previous reviews of impact assessment in all dog population management programmes (DPM) interventions, and DPM interventions involved in rabies control [26,27]
Summary
Many high-income countries have eliminated canine-mediated rabies, usually through a combination of vaccination and stray dog control. Large populations of free-roaming dogs in these countries pose a challenge for control strategies. Mass dog vaccination is widely accepted as the most feasible and cost-effective strategy for eliminating dog to human rabies transmission [2,3,4,5]. This approach is sometimes aligned with surgical sterilisation programmes, which may have different, but synergistic aims, including free-roaming dog health and welfare improvement and population reduction or stabilisation. Large scale catch- neuter-vaccinate-release (CNVR) programmes have been implemented in Bangladesh [8] and Bhutan [9]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
