Abstract

This paper explores the relationship between knowledge management and IT outsourcing. A paradox is evident in that companies are advised to develop, exploit and retain their knowledge-based assets at the same time as entering large-scale IT outsourcing deals where staff, databases and other equipment are transferred to a third-party supplier. Using empirical data from two case studies (the London Stock Exchange and the Post Office), this paper considers two competing models of how IT knowledge is acquired and managed. The first model perceives IT as a commodity that may be obtained from the marketplace. Conversely, the second model views IT as a core competence within the organisation. The paper concludes by suggesting that knowledge-based assets need to be carefully assessed before entering into outsourcing arrangements, especially where core competencies are difficult to identify, evaluate and sustain.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.