Evaluating the realized niche and plant–water relations of wetland species using experimental transplants

Abstract

Wet meadows are a common focus of wetland restoration efforts, and the species within them often exist within a restricted range of water levels. Unfortunately, many restored wetlands have higher water levels and more open water than naturally occurring reference wetlands, and many are invaded and dominated by species of Typha. Most studies evaluating the optimal water level for plant species use observational methods, yet experimental methods are required to understand the breadth of a species’ niche. We used experimental transplants of Carex pellita, a common wet meadow sedge used in restoration in the interior of the USA, and Typha latifolia, a species of cattail which invades many restored wetlands, to test whether higher water levels in a restored wetland were prohibitive to the target sedge species. Physiological and growth measurements were collected on both species. We found that C. pellita grew as well or better when transplanted into the ponded water levels, while T. latifolia had reduced growth when transplanted into the relatively drier meadow conditions. Interestingly, C. pellita was able to adjust its Turgor Loss Point in response to changing water levels. Only recently the assumption of a constant Turgor Loss Point for each species has been questioned. Our results provide evidence that wet meadow species have a broader hydrologic niche than previously thought, and their ability to make physiological adjustments in response to changing water levels may allow them to thrive in areas with widely varying water levels.