Abstract

The performance evaluation of the government venture capital guiding fund (GVCGF) has come into focus in the field of venture capital. Most of the existing studies, such as whether the GVCGF has guided social capital to start-up enterprises and has played its due role in the process of enterprise growth and innovation, are all based on relevant work under the framework of econometric analysis. Unlike in these existing studies, we construct the performance analysis model of the GVCGF from four dimensions, including the standardization development of the guidance fund, the risk control ability, and the leverage and the support effects under the framework of a multi-attribute decision-making analysis. Taking a GVCGF project in Ningbo City, China, as an example, we comprehensively evaluate the development performance of the GVCGF using the intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IFAHP). The results show that the development performance of the GVCGF is at a “relatively high” level. Compared with the traditional analytic hierarchy process (AHP), the IFAHP effectively avoids the false, enlarged influence caused by data subjectivity and evaluation uncertainty. This study provides a feasible analytical framework for the application of the IFAHP in other project performance evaluations.

Highlights

  • Many investors favor venture capital (VC) due to its unique foresight, flexibility, and high returns; this results in increased numbers of various commercial venture capital institutions [1]

  • Further comparing the results of the two methods, we find that the comprehensive evaluation values of the development performance of the government venture capital guiding fund (GVCGF) based on the intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IFAHP) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) are 0.596 and 0.599, respectively, which are close to each other, and both are in the performance evaluation range of level III, indicating that the performance level of the GVCGF of Ningbo is relatively high

  • The relevant research on whether the GVCGF has guided social capital to start-up enterprises and played its due role in the process of enterprise growth and innovation is based on the framework of econometric analysis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many investors favor venture capital (VC) due to its unique foresight, flexibility, and high returns; this results in increased numbers of various commercial venture capital institutions [1]. The direct funding support for innovation and entrepreneurship may lead some companies to send false “innovation and entrepreneurship” signals and to receive rent-seeking income. In this case, the direct government funding for innovation and entrepreneurship causes distortions; in other words, inefficient enterprises may survive while the survival of efficient enterprises may be hindered [15]. Governments around the world have introduced a large number of programs to support entrepreneurial businesses, typically through setting up the government venture capital (GVC) funds to invest in start-ups [18,19,20,21]

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call