Abstract
Critics argue that the very existence of Indigenous courts constitute an unacceptable legal dualism and a breach of the rule of law. This is refelcted in inappropriatelty shallow schemes for the assessment and evaluation of these courts. Efficiency and effectiveness are often conflated. This paper explores a range of techniques and contexts in which these specialist courts could be evaluated to give a more nuanced and realistic understanding of what they can and could achieve.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
