Abstract

Interventions that aim to increase water availability for agriculture hold great potential for improving nutrition through increasing food production, generating income, enhancing water access and sanitation and hygiene conditions, and through strengthening women’s empowerment. Yet there is scarce evidence on the linkages between small-scale irrigation and the pathways through which nutrition outcomes can be achieved. Using data from a cross-sectional household survey collected in Ethiopia and Tanzania, we explored the potential for small-scale irrigation to contribute to improved diets, and identify the pathways through which irrigation affects dietary diversity as measured by the Household Dietary Diversity Score. Unadjusted comparisons show that irrigating households in both countries produced more vegetables, fruits and cash crops, are less food insecure, have a higher value of production, and have higher production diversity and dietary diversity compared to non-irrigating households. Econometric results of a simultaneous equation (3SLS) model showed that irrigation leads to better household dietary diversity mainly through the pathway of increasing household incomes. However, these results are statistically significant only in the case of Ethiopia, and not in Tanzania. While irrigation increased production diversity in Ethiopia, the benefits of increased dietary diversity cannot be attributed to these changes in production after controlling for the effect of income. Other factors, such as gender of the household head and having off-farm income, also influence dietary diversity in Ethiopia. These findings suggest that the potential for irrigation to influence diets is highly context-specific. Understanding the particular pathways and entry points for nutrition-sensitive agriculture approaches could help to improve their benefits for nutrition.

Highlights

  • Despite recent momentum towards improving nutrition and reducing poverty globally, undernutrition still affects billions of people worldwide

  • Results from this study suggest that the relationship between irrigation and nutrition is complex and that contextual factors, such as agro-ecological conditions, access to technology, gender dynamics, and policy and institutional factors, determine the potential for irrigation to influence production decisions, income, and diet

  • Descriptive analyses from both countries revealed that irrigating households produce more vegetables, fruits, and cash crops, are less food insecure, have a higher value of production, and have higher production diversity and dietary diversity compared to non-irrigating households

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite recent momentum towards improving nutrition and reducing poverty globally, undernutrition still affects billions of people worldwide. According to the 2017 Global Food Policy Report, approximately two billion people experience micronutrient malnutrition, 155 million children under five are stunted, 52 million children are wasted, and 815 million people are chronically undernourished worldwide. Nutrition-sensitive agricultural interventions, like biofortification, crop diversification, and value-added processing, have the potential to improve nutritional outcomes in agrarian communities (Ruel et al 2017). Evidence on direct agriculture-nutrition linkages is lacking, which prevents the implementation and scale-up of successful approaches (Ruel and Alderman 2013). A recent review suggests that the potential for irrigation to impact nutrition and health outcomes has not been thoroughly explored (Domènech 2015)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call