Abstract

Since the over-modulation can lead to the unstable operation of converters, the over-modulation risk evaluation is important in the circuit parameter selection, operating region design, and so forth. However, the wildly used evaluation method of modular multilevel converters (MMCs) comes from two-level converters; and the article found that its obtained result is not always accurate for MMCs because four assumptions will be introduced when the conventional modulation ratio (CMR) is used as the indicator. To solve the problem, a new concept, namely dynamic modulation ratio (DMR), is proposed. Comparing with the CMR, the DMR can dynamically change according to the variation of operating conditions and can reflect the modulation characteristics more accurately. Quantitative comparisons are carried out between the CMR-based and the DMR-based evaluation methods in various operating conditions. The comparisons show that the CMR-based method is only accurate under a few situations for MMCs, and the obtained operating region of MMCs is not optimal when the CMR is used as the indicator in the parameter design of MMCs. In contrast, the DMR-based evaluation method is high-accurate under all situations. Finally, experiments are carried out in a down-scaled MMC prototype for further validating the method.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.