Abstract

BackgroundSurgical site infections are the most common hospital-acquired infections among surgical patients. The administration of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis reduces the risk of surgical site infections . The optimal timing of this procedure is still a matter of debate. While most studies suggest that it should be given as close to the incision time as possible, others conclude that this may be too late for optimal prevention of surgical site infections. A large observational study suggests that surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis should be administered 74 to 30 minutes before surgery. The aim of this article is to report the design and protocol of a randomized controlled trial investigating the optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis.Methods/DesignIn this bi-center randomized controlled trial conducted at two tertiary referral centers in Switzerland, we plan to include 5,000 patients undergoing general, oncologic, vascular and orthopedic trauma procedures. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: one receiving surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the anesthesia room (75 to 30 minutes before incision) and the other receiving surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the operating room (less than 30 minutes before incision). We expect a significantly lower rate of surgical site infections with surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis administered more than 30 minutes before the scheduled incision. The primary outcome is the occurrence of surgical site infections during a 30-day follow-up period (one year with an implant in place). When assuming a 5% surgical site infection risk with administration of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the operating room, the planned sample size has an 80% power to detect a relative risk reduction for surgical site infections of 33% when administering surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the anesthesia room (with a two-sided type I error of 5%). We expect the study to be completed within three years.DiscussionThe results of this randomized controlled trial will have an important impact on current international guidelines for infection control strategies in the hospital. Moreover, the results of this randomized controlled trial are of significant interest for patient safety and healthcare economics.Trial registrationThis trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT01790529.

Highlights

  • Surgical site infections are the most common hospital-acquired infections among surgical patients

  • The results of this randomized controlled trial will have an important impact on current international guidelines for infection control strategies in the hospital

  • Surgical site infections (SSI) are considered to reflect the quality of care in a hospital, as they are potentially preventable complications directly linked to surgery

Read more

Summary

Discussion

There is abundant literature on SAP and its benefits. this is the first RCT addressing the issue of exact timing of SAP. CN is responsible for the recruitment of visceral patients and data acquisition in Basel He has revised this manuscript critically for important intellectual content and given final approval of this final version. UVH is responsible for the recruitment of visceral patients and data acquisition in Basel MK is part of the data acquisition team and participates in patient follow up in Basel The hypothesis to be tested in this RCT originates from the results of our prospective observational study [62], others have published results that differ from ours

Background
Methods/Design
Findings
29. Barker FG 2nd
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call