Abstract

BackgroundCoronary artery dissection is managed primarily conservatively with serial imaging or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Exposure to contrast in either modality could potentially result in acute tubular necrosis (ATN). However, no data compares ATN incidence in these management strategies. This study compares the incidence of ATN and associated mortality of PCI and conservative management of coronary artery dissection. MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed using data from the National Inpatient Sample database, including patients with coronary artery dissection between 2016 through 2020. We analyzed the incidence of ATN and associated mortality of PCI and conservative management of coronary artery dissection. ResultsWe found that the odds of developing ATN were 22% lower in patients managed with PCI than those managed conservatively. There was no difference in the in-hospital mortality or hospital length of stay between the two groups but the mortality rate in patients with ATN was double that of those who did not develop ATN in both PCI and conservatively managed groups. ConclusionsThe higher incidents of ATN in patients with coronary dissection being managed with conservative measures compared to PCI suggest that the use of CTA may be harmful. Additionally, persons who developed ATN may have higher mortality. Therefore, more studies in the management of coronary artery dissection need to be done which would allow further steps to be taken to reduce this harm.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call