Evaluating the impact of de-escalating antimicrobial therapy in burn patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Abstract

Antimicrobials should be used appropriately to minimise the risk of resistant strains arising in association with overuse. De-escalation of antimicrobial therapy is one strategy used to ensure appropriate use, but its safety and efficacy in burn patients are unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of de-escalation therapy for treating infections in burn patients. This retrospective cohort study investigated patients admitted to our intensive care unit with burns and treated for infection between October 1, 2013, and September 30, 2020. Patients were classified into a de-escalation group (Group D) comprising patients treated with empiric antimicrobial therapy followed by de-escalation and a non-de-escalation group (Group ND) comprising patients who did not undergo de-escalation. Characteristics and outcomes were compared between groups. Forty-three patients met the inclusion criteria, including 15 patients in Group D and 28 patients in Group ND. Bacterial species commonly detected in these patients were Corynebacterium spp. (17.3%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16.1%), and Staphylococcus aureus (9.6%) . No inter-group difference was seen in 28-day mortality (6.7% vs 21.4%, p =0.391). Multidrug-resistant strains were detected significantly less frequently in Group D (13.0%) than in Group ND (26.1%, p =0.003). De-escalation was associated with use of two or more antimicrobials as empiric antimicrobial therapy. As the use of de-escalation in infection treatment did not impact 28-day mortality, de-escalation might be safe for treating infections in burn patients.