Abstract
On the basis of exergy-energy and economic-environmental (4E) parameters, passive and active indirect solar dryers (PISD and AISD) were analysed and compared by drying carrot slabs. The PISD dryer was upgraded using fans run by photovoltaic panels those were placed at the gate of a divergent duct to make an AISD setup. Experimentally measured primary parameters were used to evaluate the 4E parameters. Accordingly, AISD had enhancement in collector and drying efficiencies of 19.27 and 11.86% than PISD, respectively. Specific energy consumption (32.2%) and moisture extraction rate (47.17%) were better for AISD than PISD. Both setups were examined for their exergy parameters (mean efficiency, outflow, loss, and inflow). Exergy and environmental stability indicators such as sustainability index, environmental factor, waste exergy and improvement potential were calculated and distinguished for both dryers. AISD dryer gave better CO2 mitigation and carbon credit than PISD. The payback period of energy over 30 years lifespan was 1.33 and 1.78 years, and the economic payback period was 1.02 and 0.622 years, for PISD and AISD respectively. In comparison with PISD, the AISD achieved better in all the evaluated parameters. An uncertainty study was carried out for all the measured and estimated criteria. Results were compared with existing studies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.