Abstract

AimThe study aimed to compare the effects of 0.5% bupivacaine injection at pre-incisional port sites and intraperitoneal application on postoperative pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases.MethodsAfter taking ethical clearance, a total of 60 patients of the American Society of Anaesthesia (ASA) grades 1 and 2 scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy were enrolled in the study and were randomized into two groups. Group 1 (n=30) received 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine infiltration subcutaneously over the port sites before being given incision. Group 2 (n=30) received 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine applied in the intraperitoneal subdiaphragmatic space and in the gall bladder fossa after removal of the gall bladder. The efficacy in terms of abdominal pain, hemodynamics, complications, and total analgesic requirements were assessed at regular intervals throughout the postoperative period for 24 hours.ResultsNo significant difference in terms of demographic variables in the groups. The mean visual analog score (VAS) score for abdominal pain was found to be significantly lower in group 1 from the first postoperative hour till the twenty-fourth hour. Also, no significant difference was seen between the groups regarding hemodynamic parameters. No significant difference between the groups was seen regarding postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). The supplemental analgesic requirement was significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1.ConclusionIt was observed from this study that pre-incisional infiltration of a local anesthetic agent produces effective postoperative analgesia in the immediate postoperative hours and reduces additional analgesic requirements without causing any adverse reactions.

Highlights

  • Since 1987, the standard procedure for the treatment of gall bladder stones is laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)

  • Group 2 (n=30) received 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine applied in the intraperitoneal subdiaphragmatic space and in the gall bladder fossa after removal of the gall bladder

  • The mean visual analog score (VAS) score for abdominal pain was found to be significantly lower in group 1 from the first postoperative hour till the twenty-fourth hour

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since 1987, the standard procedure for the treatment of gall bladder stones is laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The major benefit of using laparoscopy for upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgery is that it avoids an upper abdominal incision. Such upper abdominal incisions otherwise can hinder postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation, cause surgical wound pain, and increase the total medical cost [1-3]. The postoperative pain seen after laparoscopic procedures has two components: visceral and somatic. The visceral component is due to the handling of tissues during the surgery, which causes tissue injury and the stretching of nerve endings [5]. The somatic component of pain is due to the incision made in the abdomen for the entry of the trocar [6]. Postoperative pain management is a major challenge after laparoscopic

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call