Abstract

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of interventional treatments for cardiac arrhythmias in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: Eighty AMI patients admitted between August 2022 and August 2023 were selected and randomly assigned into groups using the random number table method. The control group (n = 40) received conventional thrombolytic treatment, while the observation group (n = 40) underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Clinical effects were compared between the two groups. Results: Before treatment, there were no significant differences in heart rate indicators, cardiac function indicators, and physiological indicators between the two groups (P > 0.05). After treatment, the observation group showed significantly improved heart rate indicators, cardiac function indicators, and physiological indicators compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The adverse reaction rates in the observation group were lower than in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: PCI treatment demonstrated significant improvements in heart rate, cardiac function, and physiological indicators among AMI patients, leading to a reduced incidence of adverse reactions such as arrhythmia. The overall effect is deemed significant.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call