Evaluating the efficacy and moderators of algorithm-guided antidepressant treatments of major depressive disorder

Abstract

BackgroundIn spite of numerous options, the most efficacious treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) remains elusive. Algorithm-guided treatments (AGTs) are proposed to address inadequate remission and optimize treatment delivery. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical benefit of AGTs for MDD, and to explore specific moderators of treatment outcomes for individual patients. MethodsThe study recruited 987 patients with MDD across eight hospitals who were randomly assigned to AGT with escitalopram (AGT-E), AGT with mirtazapine (AGT-M), or treatment-as-usual (TAU). The outcomes were symptom remission, response rate, early improvement rate, subsymptom clusters improvement over time, the mean time to first remission, relapse rate at 6-months posttreatment follow-up, quality of life (QOL), and adverse events. ResutlsNo significant differences were observed across groups in outcome, except that TAU showed significantly poorer QOL, higher relapse rates at 6-months posttreatment follow-up, and marginally significantly worse maximal burden of adverse events than the AGT groups. After 6 weeks of treatment initiation, remission rate did not significantly increase with extended treatment. AGT-M outperformed the TAU and AGT-E in treating sleep symptoms. AGT-E was less effective than AGT-M and TAU in patients with severe depression and somatic symptoms (DSSS). The superiority of TAU over AGTs was observed in recurrent MDD patients. ConclusionAlthough the superiority of AGTs over TAU was limited by failure of alternative subsequent treatment, AGTs outperformed in QOL and relapse rate. Types of disease episode and DSSS were regarded as specific moderators in treatment of depression. These findings might contribute to future research on targeted antidepressant treatment.