Abstract

Upside-down jellyfish (Cassiopea sp.) are mostly sedentary, benthic jellyfish that have invaded estuarine ecosystems around the world. Monitoring the spread of this invasive jellyfish must contend with high spatial and temporal variability in abundance of individuals, especially around their invasion front. Here, we evaluated the utility of drones to survey invasive Cassiopea in a coastal lake on the east coast of Australia. To assess the efficacy of a drone-based methodology, we compared the densities and counts of Cassiopea from drone observations to conventional boat-based observations and evaluated cost and time efficiency of these methods. We showed that there was no significant difference in Cassiopea density measured by drones compared to boat-based methods along the same transects. However, abundance estimates of Cassiopea derived from scaling-up transect densities were over-inflated by 319% for drones and 178% for boats, compared to drone-based counts of the whole site. Although conventional boat-based survey techniques were cost-efficient in the short-term, we recommend doing whole-of-site counts using drones. This is because it provides a time-saving and precise technique for long-term monitoring of the spatio-temporally dynamic invasion front of Cassiopea in coastal lakes and other sheltered marine habitats with relatively clear water.

Highlights

  • Jellyfish populations are highly variable and many species can grow and reproduce rapidly in response to favourable environmental conditions [1]

  • We demonstrate that both drones and kayak-based observations are effective monitoring methods, with drones mostly averaging a higher density of Cassiopea detected at each site

  • Similar results were achieved in a study examining the use of drones for detecting pelagic jellyfish (Catostylus mosaicus), finding that drone footage detected more individuals than visual observations [36]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Jellyfish populations are highly variable and many species can grow and reproduce rapidly in response to favourable environmental conditions [1]. Enhanced dispersal from vessel ballast water, biofouling and aquaculture releases are each increasing the potential for jellyfish to thrive and expand their range [2,3,4,5]. Anthropogenic stressors, such as overfishing and habitat degradation, create openings for the opportunistic colonisers [2,6]. There is, limited data on historical abundances of jellyfish, and this has been exacerbated by past biases about their relative importance to marine ecosystems [11,12] Jellyfish are both ecologically and commercially significant (e.g. carbon sequestration from their falls or fisheries), so it is important to understand their distribution and population dynamics [13,14,15]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call