Evaluating the Effectiveness of Different Irrigant Activation Techniques in Removing the Smear Layer and Opening the Dentinal Canals: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study.

Abstract

Background Although irrigation is one of the most important stages during root canal treatment, it is not possible to guarantee the entry of irrigants to all the areas in the root canal, especially in the apical third. Therefore, the activation of irrigants can stimulate and help the irrigants to access hard-to-reach places within the root canal system. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the opening of the dentinal canals with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using different irrigant activation techniques, such as intracanal heating activation, sonic activation, and ultrasonic activation, along the walls of the root canals in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds. Methodology The study sample consisted of 36 single-canal premolars, which were randomly divided into the following three equal groups according to the method of activation used: group 1 (n = 12), which involved heating activation inside the root canals, group 2 (n = 12), which involved sonic activation, and group 3 (control; n = 12), which involved ultrasonic activation. Afterward, dental crowns were cut to standardize the working length by 18 mm and were then prepared using the ProTaper Next system up to size X2. Moreover, the irrigant was activated for each group separately, and the teeth were extracted and prepared for SEM. Three images were taken for each sample (i.e., coronal third, middle third, and apical third) at ×2,000 magnification. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results When studying the removal of the smear layer and the opening of the dentinal canal under ×2,000 magnification, there were no statistically significant differences in the coronal and middle third between the three studied groups. However, statistically significant differences were found in the apical third, where the ultrasonic activation group was the best, followed by the sonic activation group, and the heating activation group. Conclusions All methods of activation were effective in removing the smear layer and opening the dentinal canals with the advantage of ultrasonic activation in the rest of the groups.The intracanal heating irrigant activation proved to be similar to the effectiveness ofsonic activation and close to ultrasonic activation.