Evaluating the effect of psychoeducational interventions on prenatal attachment and anxiety/depression in pregnant women and partners: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

BackgroundEvidence about effective psychoeducational interventions to improve prenatal attachment, anxiety and depression has been increasing, but it lacks a complete synthesis of the results. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of psychoeducational intervention on prenatal attachment and anxiety/depression in pregnant women and their partners. MethodsTen databases were systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effectiveness of psychoeducational interventions on prenatal attachment from inception to March 2023, then manually screened to include studies of anxiety or depression. Two researchers assessed the methodological quality of the included studies using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. ResultsTen RCTs with a total of 700 pregnant women and 399 partners were included. Prenatal attachment scores after the intervention (standardized mean difference = 1.10, 95 % CI 0.65 to 1.55, P <.00001) was significantly increased and anxiety scores (standardized mean difference = −0.99, 95 % CI −1.18 to −0.80, P <.00001) was significantly lower. The subgroup analysis showed that the different prenatal attachment assessment tools were the source of heterogeneity in the combined results. The sensitivity analysis results showed reliable pooled results except for the studies using the self-made anxiety scale. ConclusionThis review suggests that psychoeducational interventions can effectively enhance prenatal attachment, reduce anxiety and depression, providing reference for the promotion of evidence-based practice of psychoeducational interventions in perinatal pregnant women and their partners.