Abstract

This study simultaneously analyzed and evaluated the meteorological drought-monitoring utility of the following four satellite-based, quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) products: the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Multi-Satellite Precipitation Analysis 3B43V7 (TRMM-3B43), the Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station (CHIRPS), the Climate Prediction Center Morphing Technique gauge-satellite blended product (CMORPH-BLD), and the Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks-Climate Data Record (PERSIANN-CDR). Data from 2000 to 2016 was used at global scale. The global Climate Research Unit (CRU) Version 4.02 was used as reference data to assess QPE products. The Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) drought index was chosen as an example to evaluate the drought utility of four QPE products. The results indicate that CHIRPS has the best performance in Europe, Oceania, and Africa; the PERSIANN-CDR has the best performance in North America, South America, and Asia; the CMORPH-BLD has the worst statistical indices in all continents. Although four QPE products showed satisfactory performance for most of the world according to SPEI statistics, poor drought monitoring ability occurred in Southeast Asia, Central Africa, the Tibetan plateau, the Himalayas, and Amazonia. The PERSIANN-CDR achieves the best performance of the four QPE products in most regions except for Africa; CHIRPS and TRMM-3B43 have comparable performances. According to the spatial probability of detection (POD) and false alarm ratio (FAR) of the SPEI, more than 50% of all drought events cannot be accurately identified by QPE products in regions with sparse gauge distribution. In other regions, such as the southeastern USA, southeastern China, and South Africa, QPE products capture more than 75% of drought events. Temporally, all datasets (except for CMORPH-BLD) can detect all typical drought events, namely, in the southeastern US in 2007, western Europe in 2003, Kenya in 2006, and Central Asia in 2008. The study concludes that CHIRPS and TRMM-3B43 can be used as near-real-time drought monitoring techniques whereas PERSIANN-CDR might be more suitable for long-term historical drought analysis.

Highlights

  • Drought is one of the most destructive natural disasters in the world; droughts occur in arid areas and in humid areas [1,2,3]

  • Severe positive discrepancies for PERSIANN-Climate Data Record (CDR), Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM)-3B43, and Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station (CHIRPS) against Climate Research Unit (CRU) gauge observations are clearly distributed in Southeast Asia, Central Africa, and Amazonia

  • CHIRPS had the best performance in Europe, Oceania, and Africa; PERSIANN-CDR

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Drought is one of the most destructive natural disasters in the world; droughts occur in arid areas and in humid areas [1,2,3]. Frequent drought disasters can profoundly affect agricultural production and, severely threaten food security and the ecological environment. As a complicated climatic event, drought is generally classified into four types: meteorological, agricultural, hydrologic, and socioeconomic [4,5]. Drought indices, determined by climatic and hydrological variables, are generally used to monitor and analyze intensity and duration of the drought events [6]. Various precipitation-based drought indices, e.g., the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) [7], the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) [8], and the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) [9], have been introduced and widely applied to monitor and evaluate drought events at different spatiotemporal scales in the world [10,11,12,13,14,15]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call