Evaluating the diagnostic value of using metagenomic next-generation sequencing on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and tissue in infectious pathogens located in the peripheral lung field.

Abstract

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) exerts a vital part in accurately diagnosing pulmonary infection. However, the diagnostic value of different samples obtained by virtual bronchoscopic navigation (VBN) combined with mNGS for pathogen detection in infections located in the peripheral lung field (PLF) is still unclear. Patients infected from July 2018 to February of the following year were carefully analyzed and divided into two parts, namely, non-infectious disease group and the infectious disease group. Then bronchial expansion tests were performed for each subject, collected liquid specimens and tissue standards, and conducted regular mNGS and microbiological detection and analysis. The value of mNGS and culture in pathogen detection was compared, at the same time, the performance of tissue mNGS and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) mNGS in the diagnosis process was compared. When discrete variables were processed, Pearson χ2 and Fisher's exact test could be used to perform categorical variables analysis. Continuous variables were analyzed and compared by Mann-Whitney U test. After mNGS diagnosis, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Rothia mucilaginosa were the bacterial species showing the highest abundances. In addition, mNGS achieved the sensitivities in the detection of pathogens in tissues and BALF of 72.9% and 81.4%, respectively, and it is higher than conventional culture. Bacterial diagnostic sensitivity was significantly different between BALF and tissue using mNGS (95.0% vs. 62.5%, P=0.03). The sensitivity and specificity of BALF in detecting fungal infections were not significantly different from those of mNGS. A consistency test showed that these two methods had some degree of consistency (k=0.673, P=0.000). This study showed that the mNGS in BALF samples and the mNGS in tissue samples which could be used to test for pathogens in the lungs. The sensitivity will increase when mNGS is combined with culture. Also, mNGS of BALF and tissues had some degree of consistency to detect fungal infections, whereas mNGS of BALF had better sensitivity to detect bacterial infection than mNGS of tissues.