Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of heat shock proteins and their combination with Alpha-Fetoprotein in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Abstract

BackgroundA growing body of research suggests that heat shock proteins (HSPs) may serve as diagnostic biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but their results are still controversial. This meta-analysis endeavors to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of HSPs both independently and in conjunction with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) as novel biomarkers for HCC detection.MethodsPooled statistical indices, including sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were computed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of HSPs, AFP, and their combinations. Additionally, the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve (AUC) was determined.ResultsA total of 2013 HCC patients and 1031 control subjects from nine studies were included in this meta-analysis. The summary estimates for HSPs and AFP are as follows: sensitivity of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69–0.85) compared to 0.73 (95% CI: 0.65–0.80); specificity of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.81–0.95) compared to 0.86 (95% CI: 0.77–0.91); PLR of 7.4 (95% CI: 3.7–14.9) compared to 5.1 (95% CI: 3.3–8.1); NLR of 0.24 (95% CI: 0.16–0.37) compared to 0.31 (95% CI: 0.24–0.41); DOR of 30.19 (95% CI: 10.68–85.37) compared to 16.34 (95% CI: 9.69–27.56); and AUC of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87–0.92) compared to 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82–0.88). The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR and AUC were 0.90 (95% CI: 0.82–0.95), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.82–0.98), 14.5 (95% CI: 4.6–45.4), 0.11 (95% CI: 0.06–0.20), 133.34 (95% CI: 29.65–599.61), and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94–0.98) for the combination of HSPs and AFP.ConclusionOur analysis suggests that HSPs have potential as a biomarker for clinical use in the diagnosis of HCC, and the concurrent utilization of HSPs and AFP shows notable diagnostic effectiveness for HCC.