Abstract

This paper investigates the effectiveness of conservation efforts in the Nyungwe Forest National Park (Nyungwe). The forest is one of the six key landscapes identified for conservation in the Albertine Rift because it hosts many threatened species. As such, a number of different stakeholders have been involved in its conservation since 1987; yet, studies that emphasize and evaluate the success of these conservation efforts are limited. We combined a rapid and relatively low cost remotely-sensed data and the Light Use Efficiency model to generate forest conservation indicators such as NDVI, forest canopy Net Primary Productivity and carbon sequestered from 1986 to 2010. The influence of topographic and climatic factors on these indicators was examined. The supervised classifier was used to catalogue the area into Forest, Wetland, and Bareland. The forest was the major category (above 90%) of Nyungwe relative to wetland and bareland. Based on degradation intensity, two distinctive periods were realised; the first period spans 8 years (1986-1994) whereas the second spans 16 years (1994-2010). The former degradation intensity period is 10 times higher than the latter period. Although the size of forest recovered up to 90%, the daily NPP and carbon sequestration capacity decreased by 37.1% (i.e. NPP 6.5 Mg tons in 1986 to 4.1 Mg tons in 2010). Areas of the forest that are physically constrained (high altitude) had a higher degradation. Guided by our indicators, there is an overall success in conservation efforts, but efforts were mostly concentrated in accessible areas. Therefore, conservation efforts that aim to respond to degradation of the inaccessible areas of the forest should be stressed in the management plan of the park.

Highlights

  • It is essential to understand whether conservation efforts are yielding the desired effects (Washington et al, 2015)

  • This paper investigates the effectiveness of conservation efforts in the Nyungwe Forest National Park (Nyungwe)

  • We evaluate the status of the Nyungwe forest National Park by using the Combinatory Tool Method (CTM)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is essential to understand whether conservation efforts are yielding the desired effects (Washington et al, 2015). Regardless of uncertainties surrounding the tools and methods for evaluating conservation efforts, there are several methods used to investigate the effectiveness of conservation projects It includes critical stories of change (Okwaare & Hargreaves, 2009), systematisation (Selener et al, 1996), outcome mapping (Davies, 2012; Earl et al, 2001), etc. Regardless of its strength, it shares a common weakness with the previous methods since it requires a considerable investment of time and high cost Most of these methods measure effectiveness at either a project level (Kapos et al, 2008) or organisational level, and some at species level as an indicator of conservation success (Washington et al, 2015). The Cambridge Conservation Forum (CCF) has developed a conceptual framework and a practical scorecard for evaluating major conservation activities but this method requires much time and cost and

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call